Compre o livro Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything na : confira as ofertas para livros em inglês e. Levitt remained unconvinced. “Let’s just give it a try,” Dubner said. It was so early in our partnership that Levitt hadn’t yet come to understand. Buy Freakonomics o Lado Oculto e Inesperado de Tudo que nos Afeta (Em escrito por Stephen Dubner sobre Steven Levitt, que gerou a ideia deste livro.

Author: Kitilar Sazil
Country: Latvia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Science
Published (Last): 20 August 2010
Pages: 380
PDF File Size: 17.74 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.85 Mb
ISBN: 805-7-63389-755-9
Downloads: 26232
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tobei

What do schoolteachers and sumo wrestlers have in common? Capas Protetoras e Kits de Limpeza. Jato de Tinta Canon. That raises the question of what effect abortion had on the crack wars.

Freakonomics by Stephen J. Dubner & Steven D. Levitt – 12min

Finally, there are books like Freakonomics that reproduce academic papers in a popular form. I found this book to be quite interesting not so much for the specific examples where conventional wisdom produced results that are clearly incorrect when viewed from the economics viewpoint of the authors, but from also from the viewpoint of how to ffreakonomics another look at major issues that confront us to discover relationships we did not know were there.

Which is more dangerous, a gun or a swimming pool?

When their paper was publicized that year, there were pro-lifers and pro-choicers who accused them of racism. Jato de Tinta Epson. A partir de 2 TB. A Response to Foote and Goetz” pdf.

Levitt and Dubner are very careful not to say that the unborn children were disproportionately black, that blacks account for a disproportionate amount of crime, and that abortion therefore reduced crime by reducing the black population.

I though that the book was useful in this respect in helping people understand what I do. In this freakojomics, street dealers are a NOT condemned to death, b not able to find other work with their experience, and c not aware of their statistical mortality as much as their potential wealth.


The result, according to our freakonomists, was an increase in crime and, eventually—they leave the chain of causation obscure, perhaps out of necessity—the violent end of the regime. This book with a memorable but useless name lifro readers with just-so stories that are good for cocktail conversations but not for understanding economics.

The Movie was released in major cities with a pay what you want pricing offer for selected preview showings.

Freakonomics commented on the effects of an abortion ban in Romania Decreestating that “Compared to Romanian children lkvro just a year earlier, the cohort of children born after the abortion ban would do worse in every measurable way: Very freakonlmics read about everyday statistics and how they explain our motivations. Abortion is almost always “birth control” in the sense that it aims at preventing birth.

Whether it is morally permissible to eliminate unborn children is what the abortion debate is about. Although in the predicted direction, the decrease in homicides of children under 1 year of age was not statistically significant.

Sexual activity without commitment was increasingly expected in premarital relationships.

Revisiting a question first studied empirically in the s, Donohue and Levitt argue that the legalization of abortion can account for almost half of the reduction in crime witnessed in the s. This research led The Economist, to its credit, to take a more skeptical look at the Freakonomics theory. Retrieved July 14, Here’s what the abstract of that study says: The Journal of Human Resources. The sumo community is very close-knit, and the wrestlers at the top levels tend to know each other well.

This is because urban, educated women livfo more likely to have abortions prior to the policy change, and the relative number of children born to this type of woman increased after the ban. The evidence behind these claims was shown to be due partly to a programming error.

Some chapters, depending on the information, was more interesting than others. In Chapter 2 of Freakonomicsthe authors wrote of their visit to folklorist Stetson Kennedy ‘s Florida home where the topic of Kennedy’s investigations of the Ku Klux Klan freakonojics discussed.


Looking at the examples used in the book, the authors essentially point out that nothing in our world exists completely independent of other factors, processes or connections, many of which have simply been ignored as possibilites.

Literatura Infantojuvenil Voltar Voltar. As Sailer notes, this is the freakoonomics of what happened.

The book presents Levitt as a “fearless,” unconventional “rogue economist. At present, the balance of evidence suggests that- it does not. Even worse, there’s nothing freaky to the stories in terms of the economics.

Freakonomics – Wikipedia

Guias de Viagem Mapas. Morris[30] Sudhir Venkatesh[31] Justin Wolfers [32] and others.

Freakonomics has been criticized for being a work of sociology or criminologyrather than economics. A Reply to Joyce” pdf. The next thing to remember is that it stands to reason that some of those extra conceptions made it through to birth. Levitt and Dubner note that their theory implies that it takes hundreds of abortions to reduce the homicide total by one [14]. oivro


I wish the authors had spent more time on the basic economics making the book a useful learning experience and less time defending empirical research freakonnomics is interesting and provocative but not really wise. The New York Times. But that is not the case. What if we could pinpoint with complete accuracy which five-year-olds were budding criminals?

Retrieved 7 June Had this point been made explicit, the reviews might not have been quite so glowing.